What Makeup Brands Test On Animals 2017

100's of millions of brute tests are performed each year
Communist china and the Us are the worst proponents of animal testing
The EU has had a cosmetic testing ban in place since 2013

Animate being Testing Facts and Statistics Overview

The number of animals used in unnecessary, roughshod testing continues to be boggling.

Whilst the verbal figures are difficult to come past – understandable when you consider the negative PR countries and companies know they'll receive – information technology's important to u.s.a. that we shed a calorie-free on industries that go on to profit from such vile practices.

Particularly ones like cosmetics – vanity industries where there's absolutely no need to test whatsoever product on animals. That's why we shine a light on then many wonderful cruelty-free companies – that we've tested, trust and thoroughly recommend.

Top eleven Almost Frightening Brute Testing Facts and Statistics

i. It is estimated that the USA performs well over 100 meg tests on animal each twelvemonth

Because America's Fauna Welfare Act (AWA) doesn't include the animals that are primarily used for testing – rats, mice and fish – the figures are wildly underestimated. The latest figures accounted for 780,070 tests.Whereas the number is more than likely around the 115 meg mark.

2. Just over 20% of the world's countries have corrective national testing bans in place

41 countries accept completely banned cosmetic testing on animals –this includes all of the European union– whilst another 17 are working on information technology.

3. Brute testing in Australia increased by 148% between 2015 – 2017

Whilst Commonwealth of australia has recently implemented a national cosmetic testing ban, Queensland recorded over 12 one thousand thousand tests on domestic fowl in 2017 without a specified purpose.

You can observe out more about brute testing in Australia here.

4. More than 90% of compounds tested on animals fail to enter the market

More contempo studies estimate animal testing has a 96% failure rate equally it's predictability has reduced.

five. Some animate being tests take years to complete and price multiple millions of dollars

Rodent cancer studies are particularly expensive and time-consuming. They tin cost $2 – four million per two-species lifetime report.

six. There are 50 validated and – in office – accustomed alternatives to brute testing

Typically alternatives to animate being testing are incredibly constructive at reducing the number of animals used equally they're more price and time-efficient. In some cases they can be 97% more cost effective (see rat 24 calendar month bioassay vs Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) prison cell transformation exam).

seven. The USA spend almost $20 billion of taxpayers money every twelvemonth on fauna testing

47% of the NIH's budget for all testing projects in the USA is spent on funding animal testing.

eight. 84,100 animals died in the UK in 2019 as a result of animal testing

nine. Almost 700,000 animals died across the European union in 2017 as a upshot of animal testing

Of the x,664,752 procedures performed on animals across the Eu in 2017, half-dozen.four% were non-recoverable and a further 10.7% (1.14 million) were classes as'astringent.'

ten. 100% of HIV vaccines that passed animal tests failed in humans

Of the near 100 HIV vaccines that passed animal tests, none of them proved successful in human trials.

After HIV vaccine gp120 failed in clinical trials, a BMJ article distinguished how the of import differences between NHPs (not-human being primates) and humans had led researchers down a doomed path.

eleven. 79% of people say they would switch if they establish out a make tested products on animals

However even so brands go along to go downward this road – Source: BUAV Poll

How Many Animals are Tested on each yr Globally?

Ultimately 100's of millions of animals are tested on each yr.

The worst proponents of creature testing are China, The United states, Commonwealth of australia and Japan. Significantly. It is likely these four countries brand up over 50% of all tests on animals across the world.

Number of Animal Tests Performed past Country

map of the 9 countries who perform the most tests on animals

The 9 Countries that perform the nearly Tests on Animals each year

Land	Number of Brute Tests per Year
The states**	100 – 120 million
China*	24 million
Australia***	20 meg
Nippon	xviii million
Canada	3.8 million
Republic of korea	3.7 million
UK	3.4 million
Germany	2.8 one thousand thousand
France	one.9 million
(Eu	10.ix meg)

*China is notoriously difficult to gather animal testing statistics from as it'south quite a closed volume. Even so nosotros took data from Cruelty Free International and applied a 20% increment – an increment in line with the residual of the countries on our listing (excluding the UK)
**The USA is equally hard to extrapolate accurate animal testing data. Co-ordinate to the Us Government statistics, only 780,070 animals were used in tests – a 5.seven% increment from 2017. But as the US has no ban in place, these statistics practise not include all animals. Virtually mice, rats, and fish are not covered past the Animal Welfare Human action – though they are notwithstanding covered by other regulations that protect beast welfare. So the broad ranging figure of upwardly to 120 meg is a best estimate for the number of animals used in United states of america laboratories.
***Australian animal testing has exploded in recent years. This has been driven by the apply of 12 1000000 domestic fowl in Queensland in 2017. The total number of animals used in 2017 (20.ii one thousand thousand) jumped from 12 million in 2016. Alarming figures to say the least.

How Many Countries Have Animal Testing Bans in Place?

There are xl Countries with National Cosmetic Testing Bans in place every bit of 2021. Which is xx.v% of the globe'southward nations.

Then there are a further 17 countries working on implementing bans – another 8.seven%. What complicates the issue are countries similar Brazil and The USA where there are partial bans in place. And we mean fractional.

In Brazil, only 6 of the 26 states have approved a ban for corrective creature testing. And the United states is even worse. In America, only 5 states accept banned cosmetic animal testing.

Countries like Canada nonetheless don't have whatever bans on corrective animal testing.

Animal Testing Statistics in the United kingdom

Testing cosmetic products and their ingredients on animals was banned in the UK in 1998 every bit part of Eu Regulation 1223/2009 (cosmetics regulation).

The ban was created because non-fauna methods were developed to test the safe of the cosmetics AND vanity products cannot be classed in the same bracket as testing on legitimate medical products.

You can read more almost the Great britain's animal testing policy here.

See how theEuropean Cosmetics Directivedefines a corrective or vanity product:

"Whatever substance or preparation intended to exist placed in contact with the various external parts of the human body (epidermis, pilus system, nails, lips and external genital organs) or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral cavity with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their advent and/or correcting body odours and/or protecting them or keeping them in good status."
— European Cosmetics Directive

iv Major Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in the UK

Every year the UK government publishes a report on the scientific procedures that occur on living animals.

This gives us the opportunity to analyse the current state of play in our own country and to encounter how beast testing has developed over the years.

3,400,000 Procedures on animals in 2019
86% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
16,100 Personal licenses handed out to test on animals
84,100 Animals died as a result

Now, there are iii licences required by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 earlier testing on animals is immune. The 3 licences needed are:

A personal licence for each person carrying out procedures on animals
A project licence for the programme of work
An establishment licence for the place at which the work is carried out

So whilst the number of tests are reducing slowly beyond the United kingdom, the number of applications forpersonal licenses is, at best, concerning.

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The EU

The UK runs the near tests on animals in the Eu, followed past French republic and Germany
6.four% of all animal tests were non-recoverable – the discipline died
In 2017 there were over 10 one thousand thousand tests on animals in the Eu

Since 2013 the Eu has implemented a ban on cosmetic animal testing.

However there are still millions of animals born specifically for testing each year and – betwixt 2013 and 2017 – the number of authorised projects has increased by 176%.

And during this timeframe, the number ofinspections – appear or unannounced – barely increased at all. As lxx% of adults in European union countries agree that replacing animal testing with non-animal methods should be an EU priority, we will continue to

4 Animate being Testing Statistics in the Eu

10,664,752 Procedures on animals in 2017
92% of the animals were mice, fish and rats
6.4% of all tests performed were non-recoverable
10.seven% of all tests performed were classed as 'severe'

What Animals were used for Animal Tests in the EU

In 2017, the main species used (for the first time) in inquiry and testing in the EU were: mice, fish, rats and birds.

Which together represented 92% of the full number of animals while species of particular public concern (dogs, cats and not-homo primates) represented less than 0.three% of the total number of animals. The same amount every bit amphibians, cephalopods and reptiles.

Pie chart depicting animals used for the first time in the EU in research and testing

But as the number of animal tests across the EU has increased by xvi% between 2017 – 2020, nosotros can apply the same increase to become estimates (albeit authentic estimates) for how many animals were used for the first fourth dimension in 2020:

Mice: half-dozen.6 million
Fish: one.4 million
Rats: 1.28 million
Birds: 0.64 million

Animal Testing Facts and Statistics in The Us

The USA arguably has the worst and least transparent brute testing policy
The Creature Welfare Human activity (AWA) doesn't cover mice, rats or fish – the most widely used animals in enquiry
Estimates put the number of animals used in animal testing at well over 100 one thousand thousand per year

99% of animals involved in tests aren't included in the Brute Welfare Act
$nineteen.half dozen billion spent past the NIH on animate being research and testing in 2020
90% of animals aren't included in official statistics
seven% of animals weren't given any pain relief

In 2019, The states government statistics put the number of laboratory animals used in research at 797,546, an increment of two.2% from 2018.

Nonetheless, considering these statistics do non include mice, rats, and fish- animals not covered by the Animal Welfare Act – they are wildly inaccurate. Estimates claim that the number of mice and rats lone is 111.v million.

We have a more than detailed breakdown on beast testing in the USA here.

Public Perception Statistics of Animal Testing

Americans…
Who oppose animal testing for scientific purposes
52%

Source: Pew Research

If a make tested on animals…
79% Of people would switch

Source: BUAV Poll

In the United kingdom…
38% Believe that cosmetic testing is legal

Source: Section for Energy, Concern & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animal Enquiry

65% of the British Public tin have animal testing for medical research…
IF there's no alternative

Source: Department for Energy, Business & Industrial Strategy – Public Attitudes to Animate being Research

Those who believe that cosmetic testing on animals is permitted in the UK are only as likely every bit the balance of the public to say they can take the use of animals in medical research. This context-driven nature of support for animate being research needs to be well-documented.

If we're all more than aware of societal laws and in particular the aplenty number of alternatives to animate being testing, we tin move towards a kinder world that no longer supports animate being testing in any forms.

What % of Animal Tests are even 'Successful?'

A test could last up to 2 years and at that place could be 2,000 animals involved
More than 90% of compounds entering clinical trials fail to gain regulatory blessing
Testing a unmarried active pesticide ingredient takes a decade, costs approximately $71,000,000 and kills up to 8,000 animals to complete all of the creature studies required to register one single pesticide

For drug testing alone the boilerplate time to bring a product to marketplace is 10-15 years.

With a electric current failure rate of 90% – 55% due to a lack of efficacy and 28% due to the toxic furnishings in humans – the demand for more efficient, sustainable technologies in risk assessment over electric current paradigms is so breathy it'southward difficult to embrace how such barbaric processes are kept alive.

What does the Future hold for Animal Testing?

Information technology's not all doom and gloom. There are some initiatives designed to reduce the number of animals involved in testing effectually the globe.

The Time to come of Creature Testing in The U.s.a.

EPA has moved away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals. A conclusion that hasn't gone down well with numerous research groups and environmentalists.

The E.P.A. Ambassador Andrew Wheeler said the agency plans to reduce the corporeality of studies that involve mammal testing by thirty pct by 2025, and to eliminate the studies entirely by 2035.

"Nosotros are really excited as this has been something nosotros've wanted for quite some time…The alternatives are the future. They're more efficient and relieve lives.."
— Kitty Block, President of the Humane Club of the USA

The Future of Animal Testing in China

Even People's republic of china, a state lambasted for information technology's approach to animal testing, is looking at loosening steps regarding corrective testing on animals.

In July 2020 China's National Medical Products Assistants (NMPA) began formulating new restrictions that are believed to lift the animal testing requirement. One that requires whatever cosmetic sold in the country to be tested on animals.

It'south the reason why companies that sell in Mainland china tinnever be labelled as cruelty-free. And why nosotros'd never trust brands who trade their humane responsibleness for some quick yen.

Whilst it'south unclear exactly what is likely to happen, we'll take any progress nosotros tin regarding China's animal testing policies.

The Future of Animal Testing in The EU

So whilst testing cosmetics on animals has been banned in the Great britain since 1998 and the EU ban on animal tested cosmetic products was commencement passed in 1993 – with the full ban taking outcome in 2013 – there are still millions of animal tests that occur each twelvemonth.

10.9 million to be verbal!

Just co-ordinate to data provided by Cruelty Gratis Europe, 70% of adults in EU countries concord that replacing creature testing with non-brute methods should be an EU priority. With such strong public backing, we're confident that whatever non-essential beast testing volition before long be made illegal across all EU states.

Additional Sources

The Canadian Council on Fauna Care

Recherche Animale Enquiry Statistics

Humane Society International – South Korea

Laboratory Beast Statistics in Germany